<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Yet Another Linux Blog &#187; experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://linux-blog.org/tag/experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linux-blog.org</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 03:57:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Overheard at the Water Cooler</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/overheard-at-the-water-cooler/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/overheard-at-the-water-cooler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux@Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/?p=906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heard at the water cooler recently in my almost all Windows workplace was something that took me by surprise.  We have a couple of highly trained individuals here in Networking.  We&#8217;re a Cisco shop, so if you know how confusing that can be, you know that not everyone can just jump right into one of [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/icecubed.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1153" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="icecubed" src="http://linux-blog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/icecubed.jpg" alt="icecubed" width="204" height="226" /></a>Heard at the water cooler recently in my almost all Windows workplace was something that took me by surprise.  We have a couple of highly trained individuals here in Networking.  We&#8217;re a Cisco shop, so if you know how confusing that can be, you know that not everyone can just jump right into one of those networks and know what they&#8217;re doing.  These individuals were having a conversation outside of my cube so I didn&#8217;t inject myself into the conversation.  But, I did ask myself, is this what Linux and Open Source is up against?  If so, we still have a long way to go.</p>
<p>It seems an external site was attempting VPN access into our corporate network.  The problem the external site was hitting was that they couldn&#8217;t initiate a session FROM their network&#8230;but someone from our location could initiate a connection TO their network.  They used a Linux box to provide them VPN, Firewall, and proxy services.  Now, any Linux admin worth his or her salt would have immediately known that being able to VPN back into a site but not VPN out of a site means that the firewall doesn&#8217;t have the right ports open and/or forwarded.  This should have been an easy fix&#8230;but the guys at this external location evidently didn&#8217;t posses this knowledge.</p>
<p>Instead of blame falling on the improper configuration, open source was blamed as a whole.  My colleagues stated that those &#8220;free tools people use never stack up to paid ones&#8221; and that &#8220;you get what you pay for&#8230;and if you don&#8217;t pay for it you don&#8217;t get it&#8221;.  So according to these guys:</p>
<ul>
<li>Free = poorly designed, less than good software</li>
<li>Paid = better designed, wicked awesome software</li>
</ul>
<p>Which of course, you and I know is a bunch of hooey.  And this is what some of the smartest guys I&#8217;ve had a chance to work with state about Linux and open source.  Makes me really wonder if they know their Cisco stuff is often times Linux and open source as well.  I guess maybe I should tell them sometime.  Either way, Linux still has a long way to go to garner the acceptance it should have.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/overheard-at-the-water-cooler/" rel="bookmark">Overheard at the Water Cooler</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on July 7, 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/overheard-at-the-water-cooler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 Little Known Thunderbird Extensions</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/4-little-known-thunderbird-extensions/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/4-little-known-thunderbird-extensions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thunderbird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips and tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/word/4-little-known-thunderbird-extensions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently searched through the mozilla thunderbird extensions website and found 4 extensions that I didn&#8217;t know about that actually prove to be quite useful. I use Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 on Foresight Linux and have tested all of these extensions and verified that they work on that environment. Hopefully, they&#8217;ll help someone craft a more enjoyable [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently searched through the mozilla thunderbird extensions website and found 4 extensions that I didn&#8217;t know about that actually prove to be quite useful.  I use Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 on Foresight Linux and have tested all of these extensions and verified that they work on that environment.  Hopefully, they&#8217;ll help someone craft a more enjoyable email experience <img src='http://linux-blog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="/uploads/Posts/searchfor.png"><img src="/uploads/Posts/searchfor.Thumbs.png" alt="" width="75" height="110" align="right" /></a><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/3851"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Search for Sender</strong></span></a></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re like me, you like to group like items together in your inbox.  With this extension, you can group emails from the same sender as quickly as a right click.  Really, it&#8217;s just a shortcut that places the sender email up into the search box and searches for you.  The nice part is, with this extension, you don&#8217;t have to type it.  Quick, easy, and simple.  This has quickly become an extension that I cannot live without.</p>
<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/2215"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>SyncMab</strong></span></a></p>
<p><a href="/uploads/Posts/syncmab.png"><img src="/uploads/Posts/syncmab.Thumbs.png" alt="" width="102" height="110" align="left" /></a>SyncMab is an extension similar to foxmarks for Firefox.  With foxmarks, you keep all your bookmarks on a central server of your choosing so that your bookmarks are the same across all computers you use that have Firefox installed.  This is perfect for me since I have a set of work bookmarks and home bookmarks and like to be able to switch back and forth between them.  But what about thunderbird?  It doesn&#8217;t have bookmarks right?  Exactly, but it does have contacts in your addressbook!  So, you&#8217;ll be able to save your contacts to a server of your choosing and then on another computer with thunderbird you can synchronize your contacts by downloading that file using SyncMab.  It&#8217;s brilliant and allows you to always have the same contacts across operating systems, across computers, and even to maintain multiple addressbooks <img src='http://linux-blog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/881"><strong>Display Quota</strong></a></p>
<p>This extension will display a small graphic in Thunderbird that tells you how much space you have left in your IMAP mail account and can warn you when you get close to filling up.  This might not be too useful for those of you that use IMAP with huge quotas (gmail) but for others, it may be.  I have heard that some users do not like the popup that displays for warning on this extension.  For those users, Thunderbird has a built in function you can enable:</p>
<p>Open your configuration editor in Thunderbird and find the following keys:</p>
<ol>
<li><tt>mail.quota.mainwindow_threshold.show</tt> &#8211; % when quota should show up</li>
<li><tt>mail.quota.mainwindow_threshold.warning</tt> &#8211; % when quota becomes yellow</li>
<li><tt>mail.quota.mainwindow_threshold.critical</tt> &#8211; % when quota becomes red</li>
</ol>
<p>Thanks to <a href="http://goddess-gate.com/dc2/index.php/post/268">goddess-gate.com for information</a> on how to do this.</p>
<p><span id="more-216"></span></p>
<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/345"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Sender Verification</strong></span></a></p>
<p><a class="serendipity_image_link" href="../../uploads/Posts/senderverification.png"><!-- s9ymdb:610 --><img class="serendipity_image_right" style="border: 0px none; float: right; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="../../uploads/Posts/senderverification.Thumbs.png" alt="" width="110" height="84" /></a>With the sender verification extension&#8230;you can verify that the email that has been sent actually came from the sender. This extension goes out and checks the domain in the FROM field and makes sure that the email originated from this address.</p>
<p>Does it work 100% of the time? No. But for a majority of emails, this extension will make sure that someone hasn&#8217;t spoofed an email address in your addressbook to bypass your spam filters. The extension uses Sender Policy Framework (SPF) and DNS-based reputation lists to make it&#8217;s decision and report back to you.</p>
<p>I opened up the preferences for this extension and made sure to toggle &#8220;Show verification results in statusbar&#8221; so that on the bottom of every email, SVE results display. This even works for previewing mail messages in the preview pane. You can also set individual white lists of domains not to check.</p>
<p>In all, quite a handy anti-phishing extension to make Thunderbird just a bit more secure.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>What Obscure Extensions Do You Use?</strong></span></p>
<p>What obscure extensions do you use to customize your inbox? How do youe extend thunderbird to do your bidding? How does it help you take charge of an unruly inbox? Please share your comments with us here and let us know the steps you&#8217;ve taken to rule over your emails.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/4-little-known-thunderbird-extensions/" rel="bookmark">4 Little Known Thunderbird Extensions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on June 25, 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/4-little-known-thunderbird-extensions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I Choose PCLinuxOS</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/why-i-choose-pclinuxos/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/why-i-choose-pclinuxos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mepis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mypclinuxos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCLinuxOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texstar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/word/why-i-choose-pclinuxos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been quite a few postings and articles on new users and Linux flourishing during the past year. The reason I believe this to be is that desktop Linux is approaching or has arrived at the tipping point where it can gain mainstream adoption. People are seeing Linux as a viable alternative to Microsoft. My [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="BORDER-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 5px; BORDER-TOP: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; FLOAT: left; BORDER-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px" src="http://linux-blog.org/uploads/Reviews/badge3.Thumbs.png" alt="" width="110" height="28" />There&#8217;s been quite a few postings and articles on new users and Linux flourishing during the past year.  The reason I believe this to be is that desktop Linux is approaching or has arrived at the tipping point where it can gain mainstream adoption.  People are seeing Linux as a viable alternative to Microsoft.  My wife recently had me nuke the dual boot computer and go with Linux due to Windows Media Player 11 restrictions set to come out when it is released.  Her main concern is being told by companies how she should be able to listen to her music after she&#8217;s bought it&#8230;kinda like buying a car and the dealer tells you where you can drive it and how you can.  She&#8217;s in the process of converting all her mp3&#8242;s to ogg&#8217;s to 1) save space and 2) because they sound better and are in a free format.  Thus far, she&#8217;s not missing Windows.</p>
<p>Many blogs also have taken up this topic and, when determining the best Linux desktop, gushed about <a href="http://www.xandros.com/" target="_blank">Xandros</a>, <a href="http://freespire.org/" target="_blank">Freespire</a>, <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/" target="_blank">Ubuntu</a>, and <a href="http://www.mepis.org/" target="_blank">MEPIS</a>.  The thing I find odd is that they forget the little guy that&#8217;s outpacing all the others&#8230;and that little guy is <a href="http://www.pclinuxos.com/" target="_blank">PCLinuxOS</a>.  Let&#8217;s take a look at a few reasons why PCLinuxOS is, IMHO, the best Linux flavor for new users.</p>
<p><span id="more-87"></span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">1. Hardware Versatility &amp; Compatibility</span></p>
<p>PCLinuxOS comes in three flavors for the current .93a release. Those three are minime, Junior, and Big Daddy. Minime is a minimal 299MB iso with a functional KDE desktop. I&#8217;ve seen postings in the forum that this runs nicely on a 350Mhz PII and I&#8217;ve successfully had it running on a Celeron 900 with 256MB PC100 RAM. So I know that it works for older computers. If you don&#8217;t want a speedy desktop that you can custom build with synaptic and would rather have a few default applications installed right away&#8230;try Junior. You can also get the whole she-bang using &#8220;Big Daddy&#8221;. It&#8217;s really up to you&#8230;I dig this concept as well since it allows you to build from the ground up or hit the ground running right away.</p>
<p>Hardware detection with PCLinuxOS is fantastic. Wireless and ndiswrapper are configured through a central control center (see #4). PCLinuxOS is compatible with many old computers as well as new ones. PCLinuxOS will detect just about anything you throw at it. Most Linux does now but with the <a href="http://livecd.berlios.de/" target="_blank">LiveCD project at berlios</a>, PCLOS has an ace in it&#8217;s hand&#8230;it&#8217;s a fantastic project that allows great hardware detection. I&#8217;ve seen so many people have operational PCLOS desktops immediately after install&#8230;no tweaking needed. I&#8217;m amazed at this aspect of this distro.</p>
<p>If you want the solid performance of PCLinuxOS with full access to all repositories and software updates on a speedier desktop, you might try <a href="http://sam.hipsurfer.com/" target="_blank">SAM Linux</a>. SAM is PCLinuxOS as a base with XFCE for a desktop. SAM worked quite nicely on my Celeron 900 as well with even more speed than minime&#8230;which is understandable since <a href="http://www.xfce.org/">XFCE</a> is notibly faster due to less bloat.</p>
<p>PCLinuxOS has been nothing but solid for all my computing needs, whether XFCE, Gnome, or KDE. In all, hardware on PCLinuxOS is just as much a no brainer as it is on Ubuntu, MEPIS, Xandros, and Freespire&#8230;with three flavors to choose from.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">2.  Software</span></p>
<p>PCLinuxOS is meant for the desktop. It&#8217;s meant to be used for your day to day operation. It&#8217;s user-centric, not developer-centric. Since PCLOS is geared toward every day users and for desktop operation it contains access to thousands of programs that desktop users find useful. With less emphasys on maintaining packages for the server, the lead developer is able to concentrate on the desktop and actually listen to us, the users&#8230;and listen he does. PCLinuxOS is one of the only distros out there that I know of where I got a response from the head developer when I asked him a question or wanted a program added to the repository. That sets it apart from other distros. Texstar (the head developer) takes pride in his product and listens to his intended audience for direction&#8230;he doesn&#8217;t just hear them&#8230;he listens. 5,000+ software packages (and counting) in the official repository speak volumes for this fact.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">3.  It Just Works</span></p>
<p>Many new users go distro hopping, trying to find something that &#8216;just works&#8217; for them. People often say in the official forums that PCLinuxOS is &#8220;<a href="http://www.pclinuxos.com/forum/index.php?topic=11368.msg86611#msg86611" target="_blank">The Distro Hopper Stopper</a>&#8220;.  It does seem to fill what is missing for so many new users.  There&#8217;s a reason it has raced into the top ten distros at <a href="http://distrowatch.serve-you.net/" target="_blank">distrowatch.com</a> this year&#8230;for so many users, it just works. ATI and Nvidia drivers are only a synaptic intall away&#8230;everything works right out of the box. This is one of the reasons new users should consider PCLinuxOS.</p>
<p>If one were to compare shopping for any product out there with shopping for a Linux distro&#8230;would you want the product that required you to &#8216;fix it&#8217; before you could use it? You just order XYZ mp3 player from Amazon&#8230;but when it arrives, you have to configure it, tweak it, and hack it until it&#8217;s usable. To me, this doesn&#8217;t make sense. If I find a distro that requires less configuring and tweaking to get me up and running and one that provides the best experience&#8230;I&#8217;d stick with it.</p>
<p>For me, there is no other choice. I use PCLinuxOS because it requires me to invest the least amount of time (and since my wife uses it as well, the least amount of worry) spent configuring, compiling, and setting things up. PCLinuxOS users&#8217; needs are no different than other Linux distro users. They need to edit, listen to, and organize their music. They need to design the layout of that web page. They need to develop programs and write code. They need to slice and dice all aspects of their desktop experience. If you are one of those other distro users, I commend you for using Linux since it puts you in the drivers seat. Keep at it and keep at using and spreading Open Source software and Linux. If you&#8217;ve made the switch to desktop Linux and haven&#8217;t tried PCLinuxOS in the past month, I recommend you do so&#8230;you&#8217;re missing out on a gem of a distro made for you, the desktop Linux user.</p>
<p>I also commend PCLinuxOS for providing the users with the &#8220;desktop experience&#8221; it provides which allows those users to do this fluidly and with the greatest amount of efficiency. People that try and use PCLinuxOS know right away that something is different. It&#8217;s the attention to detail and fluid design that combine together give the user that &#8220;desktop experience&#8221; that no other distro can. For me, it made using Linux fun.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">4.  PCLinuxOS Control Center</span></p>
<p>When I first switched to Desktop Linux, I immediately noticed that there wasn&#8217;t a control panel where I could go for a &#8216;one stop shopping place&#8217; to control my applications and running services. Having been a <a href="http://www.slackware.com/">slackware</a> user for about 4 years at the time, it didn&#8217;t matter much to me&#8230;but when I thought of new users coming in as Windows refugees or having no computer experience&#8230;it made me cringe. How could Linux not provide a central place to control their system? Sure, KDE has the control panel to control appearance, layout, and behavior&#8230;but what about network interfaces? Can everyone use ifconfig? Does everyone know how to modprobe? Most likely not.</p>
<p>PCLinuxOS makes a fantastic effort in this realm.  With the <a href="http://www.tuxmachines.org/gallery/pclos93amm/pcc2" target="_blank">PCLinuxOS Control Center</a>, you are in the drivers seat of your operating system&#8230;not along for the ride. You control boot options, hardware, mount points, networking, security, system configurations, sharing, network services, authentication, and groupware; all from a handy control center that is point-click easy. The Control Center is the single greatest reason I&#8217;ve converted more users to PCLinuxOS than any other distro. It&#8217;s also the single greatest reason that new users should consider PCLinuxOS first before all other flavors of Linux.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">5.  The Community</span></p>
<p>Sometimes, smaller is better. Go with me on this and get your minds out of the gutter. PCLinuxOS has quite a bit smaller community than Ubuntu, MEPIS, Mandriva, and Fedora Core. All of those distros have quite a huge following. So how is it that such a small distro can march into the top ten at distrowatch and hold its own? The community is a huge reason. This small community has produced some of the greatest tools for their users: The <a href="http://www.pclinuxonline.com/wiki/HomePage" target="_blank">wiki</a>, the <a href="http://www.mypclinuxos.com/downloads/index.php/" target="_blank">New User Guides</a>, <a href="http://mag.mypclinuxos.com/index.php" target="_blank">PCLinuxOS Magazine</a>, <a href="http://tuxmachines.org/node/6898" target="_blank">Kids Safe PCLinuxOS</a>, and countless other projects and startups. There are so many things happening within the community right now, there&#8217;s always a place to become involved or to stand back and watch things happen (politely tagging along for the ride). I really feel great about the directions that PCLOS is moving in and the future of this desktop. The thing I take most heart in is that the developers listen to their community.</p>
<p>As a Slackware user, I remember getting flamed quite heavily in an IRC channel I joined after first installing it. Rightly so&#8230;I was asking the dumbest questions and not even trying to search for things&#8230;but of course, I didn&#8217;t know how to search. Had someone shown me the proper way of doing things, I might have had a flameless time with Slack. With PCLinuxOS, I envy new users. They get to be a part of a community that welcomes them in and treats them as equals regardless of experience level. They get a fantastic wiki that takes their hand and walks them through setting up their desktop and feeling comfortable in their new environment. Many of the &#8220;gee whiz&#8221; items that new users ask about and get flamed for are solved for them in the wiki and if it isn&#8217;t, the forums are friendly and welcoming.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">6.  Try Before you &#8220;Buy&#8221;</span></p>
<p>PCLinuxOS is a Live CD. You can boot up and run the entire operating system without installing it. This allows you to take a look at things before you &#8220;buy&#8221; (you don&#8217;t buy since it is 100% free) aka commit it to a hard disk. Ubuntu went in this direction as well with their last version. SuSe also has a Live CD as well. This is a great way for new Linux users to experience Linux. With Ubuntu and PCLinuxOS, it is taken a step further&#8230;you&#8217;re able to install the operating system while using the Live CD. After the install is finished, a reboot and you&#8217;re up into your shiny, new desktop.</p>
<p>One of the niftiest features of PCLinuxOS as a Live CD is that you can install the CD to RAM and pull out the disk. This means that you&#8217;re running the entire operating system from RAM&#8230;which also means fantastic speed. PCLinuxOS becomes a Live RAM distro at that point. It does take a while to load to RAM, but after you&#8217;re up and running you&#8217;ll be amazed at the speed. You can install the OS in this mode as well.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">7.  Community Projects</span></p>
<p>I am the webmaster and administrator at <a href="http://www.mypclinuxos.com/index.php" target="_blank">MyPCLinuxOS.com</a>. This is a community projects site for PCLinuxOS. If the community has a want or need for the OS, we start a project and rally support around it. We then take that idea and make it a reality. The new user guides and wiki were a product of this and other fantastic projects are springing up ever single day. There is a SOHO edition in the works, a MythTV Edition, the PCLinuxOS Beautification Project, Edulos &#8211; PCLinuxOS Eduction Edition, the PCLinuxOS Magazine Project (now on it&#8217;s third issue), and other projects. I encourage you to get involved if you use PCLinuxOS and help give back to your favorite distro. If you&#8217;re not using PCLinuxOS and are curious about what&#8217;s going on, come on in and register at MyPCLinuxOS&#8230;drop us a comment or question and we&#8217;ll do our best to help you get the information you need. Please remember that this website is ONLY for community projects&#8230;all official help requests should go to the official forums at pclinuxos.com.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">8.  Pride and Ownership</span></p>
<p>All of the reasons above combine to make this last reason hit home. The userbase of PCLinuxOS really takes pride in their distro. The pride comes from having a stake in the way in which PCLinuxOS is developed. See, Texstar is a unique developer in that he listens to his users and adapts his development to suit them. Of course, you can&#8217;t please everyone but Tex does a fantastic job with about 90% of the userbase and the other 10% are a synaptic install away from being happy.</p>
<p>When you have a community that develops with you, you develop with the community. Texstar has seen this happen from the early and small beginnings when PcLinuxOS was just a fork of Mandrake 9.2. Fast forward to today where PCLinuxOS is a conglomeration of many different distros with an active community that takes pride and ownership of their favorite desktop Linux. I don&#8217;t know how he did it, but others should take note and duplicate it. PCLinuxOS is near and dear to its users and I don&#8217;t see that changing anytime soon.</p>
<p>In closing, I really feel that PCLinuxOS is on track to be the best Linux desktop users can get for free today. I&#8217;m sure there are supporters of other distros out there that are saying &#8220;But my_distro does this too!&#8221; or &#8220;my_distro has all of the things you&#8217;re talking about as well&#8221;. In that case, congratulations on finding a great fit for you! I commend you for using Linux and am glad we&#8217;re members of the same community! Just remember that the same size glove does not fit everyone&#8230;if you&#8217;re helping others in their Linux journey&#8230;make sure that your bias toward one distro doesn&#8217;t limit the choices that the new user deserves. I always give new users that I help the choice between all of the major desktop-centric distros before I tell them which one I think is best&#8230;it&#8217;s great to see what happens when the decide. And remember, if your distro is the best for that new user&#8230;they&#8217;ll choose it and use it. Just make sure that in the spirit of open source you do not limit their choices in the beginning. Hopefully, you&#8217;ll take another look at PCLinuxOS and include it in the list of those you present to new users!</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/why-i-choose-pclinuxos/" rel="bookmark">Why I Choose PCLinuxOS</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on October 13, 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/why-i-choose-pclinuxos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PCLinuxOS .93 xorg.conf problem quick fix</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/pclinuxos-93-xorgconf-problem-quick-fix/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/pclinuxos-93-xorgconf-problem-quick-fix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mepis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mypclinuxos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCLinuxOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texstar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/word/pclinuxos-93-xorgconf-problem-quick-fix/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re like me, you change things constantly in your linux desktop. I&#8217;m always entering in and tweaking .conf files to see what I can do and where the limits of things might be. In my attempt yesterday to get my EXACT monitor supported in PCLinuxOS, I hosed my xorg.conf file which is where all [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border: 0px none ; float: left; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="/uploads/Penguin.Thumbs.jpg" alt="" width="110" height="75" />If you&#8217;re like me, you change things constantly in your linux desktop.  I&#8217;m always entering in and tweaking .conf files to see what I can do and where the limits of things might be.  In my attempt yesterday to get my EXACT monitor supported in PCLinuxOS, I hosed my xorg.conf file which is where all the Xsession settings (or Xwindows session) are stored (like mouse, keyboard, monitor, and graphics driver settings).  Since I hosed this up, my graphical user interface and window manager would not start.  So I was dropped to login via the shell.  This might be daunting for some new users in Linux so I figured I&#8217;d write up this little how-to that would get them back on their feet.</p>
<p>First, don&#8217;t be intimidated by the shell.  It&#8217;s more powerful than a cmd line in windows and you&#8217;ll have complete control of your computer from the confines of this awesome tool.  Plus, you&#8217;re about 15-20 seconds away from having your desktop back up and running by executing only a few commands.</p>
<p>In order to fix your xorg.conf file, it&#8217;s important that we become root&#8230;so login as root and let&#8217;s fix your xorg.conf file in 4 commands.</p>
<p><span id="more-141"></span></p>
<p>First, let&#8217;s get to the right directory to work with xorg.conf:</p>
<pre class="brush: plain;">[root@lostmain ~] cd /etc/X11</pre>
<p>Next, let&#8217;s remove all xorg.conf files and any backups (usually saved as xorg.conf.old or xorg.conf.bak) with the next command:</p>
<pre class="brush: plain;">[root@lostmain X11] rm -f xorg.conf*</pre>
<p>The -f flag forces the deleting of the files without prompting and the * means that we&#8217;ll delete any file that starts with xorg.conf. That means xorg.conf.bak and xorg.conf.old will be deleted right along with our original xorg.conf file as well. Now let&#8217;s fix this by using the shell PCLinuxOS Control Center. That&#8217;s right, you don&#8217;t have to have KDE fired up and running to access the PCLinuxOS Control Center&#8230;you can do it right here:</p>
<pre class="brush: plain;">[root@lostmain X11]mcc</pre>
<p>Now use arrow keys to go into hardware and configure the display. When choosing a monitor, the quickest and easiest way to get back into a GUI is to use the &#8220;Generic&#8221; setting. I chose Generic 1280X1024 @ 76 for my Samsung Syncmaster 710N 17&#8243; LCD screen. Next up, If you have the ATI or Nvidia driver installed, it will ask you if you&#8217;d like to use it (choose yes). It will then ask if you&#8217;d like to change any options&#8230;the default is usually ok. Now it will take you in to test the configuration. If you see the rainbow test screen, you&#8217;re set. If not, you&#8217;ll have to change things (normally resolution) until you&#8217;re able to see it. The test screen will ask you if you&#8217;d like to use the settings it is using to test the screen&#8230;hit yes (it might be &#8220;ok&#8221;, I&#8217;m going from memory here) and you&#8217;ll be dropped right back to the shell.</p>
<p>Now we could just start kdm/xdm and an Xsession here&#8230;but it&#8217;s much easier for new users to simply reboot so:</p>
<pre class="brush: plain;">[root@lostmain X11] reboot</pre>
<p>Next time you start up things should be back to normal. Isn&#8217;t it nice to be able to have quick resolution to many Linux problems via the PCLinuxOS Control Center? What a great tool!</p>
<p>That was one of the main reasons I chose PCLinuxOS over other desktops&#8230;it has the PCLinuxOS Control Center available for me to configure samba, groupware, LDAP, Printers, etc&#8230;.pretty much anything I need to configure in Linux is ready and waiting for me in this fantastic control center. It usually puts new users at ease as well since they&#8217;re used to the control panel in Windows. I know when I was first introduced to Linux I noted that there was not a central place where I could control all things Linux (although /etc in Slackware is handy <img src='http://linux-blog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  ). This Control Center puts all other distros to shame it&#8217;s so complete. Plus, if you&#8217;re missing anything&#8230;a quick word to the devs and chances are you&#8217;ll see it included very soon. So get used to that PCLinuxOS Control Center!! Remember that you can call it via the shell as well with the pcc command. Hopefully, this little tip has been helpful to you.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/pclinuxos-93-xorgconf-problem-quick-fix/" rel="bookmark">PCLinuxOS .93 xorg.conf problem quick fix</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on October 4, 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/pclinuxos-93-xorgconf-problem-quick-fix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of Vista, Linux, and the User Experience</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/of-vista-linux-and-the-user-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/of-vista-linux-and-the-user-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/word/of-vista-linux-and-the-user-experience/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading this article earlier this week and thought that it was interesting. It announced the Windows Vista release as being delayed. I thought that this was just par for the course and something Microsoft always has done and will always do&#8230;delay. However, what does this mean for the Linux desktop? Does it mean [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border: 0px none ; float: left; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="/uploads/FileAlert.Thumbs.png" alt="" width="110" height="110" />I was reading <a title="Vista Delay" href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/11958674/" target="_blank">this article</a> earlier this week and thought that it was interesting. It announced the Windows Vista release as being delayed. I thought that this was just par for the course and something Microsoft always has done and will always do&#8230;delay. However, what does this mean for the Linux desktop? Does it mean anything at all? Probably not on the scale most are hoping.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s Opportunity, Albeit, a Small One</span></p>
<p>Does anyone else here smell that? It&#8217;s opportunity. Perhaps an opportunity to push Linux just a little while longer and to develop it into what it needs to be before Microsoft once again proliferates itself onto every PC in America and sets the standard to which all things are compared.  I can just see it when Vista finally does release&#8230;all of the comparison articles that will sprout across the web between Vista and desktops such as Ubuntu and SuSe 10.X.  Linux can gain ground only one way; if it can become about user experience versus user function.  If it can do that, I think Linux just might gain some ground. Babysteps&#8230;that&#8217;s what it is all about.</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s OS has always been a rip-off of the work others do. OS/2 did things before Microsoft&#8230;Macs did things before Microsoft. They&#8217;ve been playing constant catch up since Windows began. If developers and users seize this opportunity in Linux to develop their distros in new ways, it can give Linux a slight foothold onto the desktop. Notice I said <em>slight</em> foothold. That&#8217;s because Linux will never storm onto the desktop. It will chip away slowly at the desktop until it gains acceptance. Linux has been granted a small door to the desktop and there is a set criteria for those distros that want to go through it. Will your favorite distro be able to go through the door?  Can it provide the user experience needed to win people on the desktop over?</p>
<p><span id="more-123"></span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">User Experience versus User Function</span></p>
<p>Most Linux distros just don&#8217;t get it. Everyone touts Ubuntu. They don&#8217;t get it. They say Linux for human beings but then make it so only human beings that are technologically savvy can use it. SimplyMEPIS touts being simple yet you have to enter into your sources.list and edit it before you can update it the first time. All of these distros have forgotten why people create operating systems and software. They&#8217;re trying really hard but missing the mark ever so slightly.</p>
<p>Why do people create operating systems and software? To help people with computing right? Perhaps to become notorious? Imagine that you have no operating system or an OS with no software to use on you PC. How would you accomplish anything at all? It would be rather difficult. The interesting part about this is that if you ask any software developer or programmer why they program/develop software they do it for 3 reasons:</p>
<ol>
<li>Very good Pay and notoriety</li>
<li>Because they Can</li>
<li>To assist themselves or others with Computing Functions</li>
</ol>
<p>There is nothing wrong with these approaches (I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve left out a couple of approaches)&#8230;but something is lost in the transfer between programmer/developer and the end user. What is it? It&#8217;s knowledge and experience&#8230;or lack thereof.</p>
<p>Anyone can make a program function. I have a C program I wrote waaaay back in the day that can operate as accounting software. Yet, people use QuickBooks, Kmymoney, and Appgen. Why is that? Why don&#8217;t they use the bare bones functional program they could get for free from me? It works pretty darn good&#8230;helps them file their taxes, and keeps track of all finances&#8230;why don&#8217;t they use this functional program? Because the knowledge it takes to use and support it is greater than those other programs I mentioned <span style="text-decoration: underline;">AND</span> because it plainly doesn&#8217;t provide the same user experience as the aforementioned programs. It&#8217;s all of these reasons we can roll up into something called the &#8220;User Experience.&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Experienced User and User Experience</span></p>
<p>One of my friends on the web is the webmaster of Lobby4Linux.com. He&#8217;s done some small usability studies in the best place you could possibly do it&#8230;a suburban shopping mall. You do studies like that and you can really tell where you stand. Sad to say that current desktops for Linux don&#8217;t stand a chance the way they are currently because most developers aren&#8217;t developing in the right mindset and focus. They&#8217;re developing for each other and for props from the community.</p>
<p>Imagine for a second if Apple decided they didn&#8217;t want to make Ipod easy to use anymore&#8230;they just wanted to develop software for their buddies and they wanted to make Ipod&#8217;s have the latest bells and whistles all the while ignoring pleas from those who cry out for change. That&#8217;s what Linux is doing. Ignoring the most important part of their community. New users and their opinions should hold the most weight with Linux developers and application programmers&#8230;because these people are providing the most pure look at the software. They aren&#8217;t polluted with elitism, they haven&#8217;t adopted a stance with the GPL or FLOSS yet&#8230;they&#8217;re just here to check out the software.</p>
<p>Say you are a developer or programmer. The minute a new user doesn&#8217;t understand how to do something, there is a problem with your product. No you can&#8217;t fix everything for everyone, but as a developer you should be trying to do so&#8230;we cannot reach perfection but we can chase it.</p>
<p>The odd part about this user centric philosophy is&#8230;if a developer or company or even a distro adopts a &#8216;user experience&#8217; centric development process&#8230;they succeed. Two examples show us how clear this is.</p>
<ol>
<li>Apple Ipod. Nuff said&#8230;they aren&#8217;t about functions and features&#8230;they don&#8217;t claim to be the best video/audio tool out there. They offer the best user experience. Hence, why they are number one and sell more product worldwide than anyone period. Also this is why they are the largest brand recognized on the planet&#8230;even more recognized than Microsoft.</li>
<li>Novell and SuSe 10 &#8211; You may think you know what SuSe is about&#8230;you may be discounting Novell because you think their ship has set sail many years ago when Microsoft took over. Then you need to <a title="Novell Brainshare 2006" href="http://www.novell.com/img/flash/load_stream.html?temp=1&amp;id=brainshare2006monday_press_conference" target="_blank">watch this video on Brainshare</a> and pay specific attention to why the two desktop developers are developing the way they are. You&#8217;ll hear about user experience and &#8216;won&#8217;t attract new users&#8217; and other key phrases. This is terminology and focus that ALL Linux distros should be focused on if they want their distro to succeed.</li>
</ol>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong&#8230;I&#8217;m all for having a new user Google a solution or RTFM. However, has anyone ever stopped to think that a new user might not know how to search for information? How many new users out there know Boolean logic? It&#8217;s relatively hard for new users to Linux in general to find information on how to do things in Linux. Why do many community members throw these new users an anchor when they ask for a life raft? Remember, if Linux is to succeed, it needs to be about the entire user experience which starts the minute the user thinks to him/herself &#8220;I think I&#8217;ll give that Linux thing a try.&#8221; The spotlight is unfortunately on Linux and community from the beginning.</p>
<p>Taking the time to teach a new user the correct way of searching for answers is a good step in the right direction. However, taking stock in what area of the OS/software that new user is questioning is a better step in the right direction. Listen to the new users, their eyes are open where others are closed. They don&#8217;t look at the same scene everyday&#8230;they see things anew. Remember:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes. ~Marcel Proust</em></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s about togetherness, not elitism</span></p>
<p>Linux is about a large collection of people working toward a common goal. This common goal is to proliferate Linux to all corners of the globe as an alternative way of computing to the status quo that Microsoft gives us. It absolutely is not about being smarter than everyone or being able to look down one&#8217;s nose at people. Unfortunately, due mainly to a rise in popularity of Linux, an influx of interest has resulted in an outflow of community. Elitism runs rampant through many forums and newbies are sometimes chastised for asking questions instead of being shown the proper way of asking.</p>
<p>So what are we to do? How do we continue making The Linux Experience about togetherness vs. elitism? The Linux community on a whole must take a stand against those who have no desire to help someone based solely on their experience level. Sure, I know there are those that say RTFM (read the friendly manual) or &#8216;google it&#8217; but you and I both know that information isn&#8217;t organized how it should be with Linux. Remember that some of these people that are trying Linux for the first time don&#8217;t even know about boolean logic with search engines nor about http://google.com/linux so how do we expect them to find information unless it is organized logically (say&#8230;in a wiki)?</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Door is Open, Only a Few can Pass</span></p>
<p>The door to the desktop is open. I truly believe that Linux can take innroads to success for personal computing. However, I believe that if more distros do not take the approach of SuSe or PCLinuxOS, being about user experience versus whiz bang nifty old tools and bells and whistles&#8230;Linux will not gain desktop adoption.</p>
<p>My grandfather used to be a handy-man at a retirement home when I was a little kid. I remember going to work with him during the summer when school was out (mainly because we couldn&#8217;t afford daycare) and working with him. One thing sticks out in my memory now that I write this article about user experience. I remember that one year my grandmother bought him new tools to use on the job. They were supposed to be the best thing on the market and carry a lifetime guarantee. Those tools were used a total of 3 days&#8230;they didn&#8217;t have the feel of the old ones.</p>
<p>Linux will need to feel like those old tools to everyone before it can succeed. It needs to give people a warm and fuzzy feeling and it needs to cater to the most technically challenged person on the planet in order to gain ultimate acceptance.</p>
<p>Perhaps developers and programmers will read this article and choose the red pill instead of the blue one. Then again, they may not. Whatever they decide, their user-base is changing toward one with less Linux knowledge and one that thrives on user experience. If one does not adapt, one will be left behind.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/of-vista-linux-and-the-user-experience/" rel="bookmark">Of Vista, Linux, and the User Experience</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on March 23, 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/of-vista-linux-and-the-user-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>mv elitism  /dev/null</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/mv-elitism-devnull/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/mv-elitism-devnull/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 14:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great divide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/word/mv-elitism-devnull/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the beginning of things, open source was about open everything. I remember joining an irc channel # on efnet back in 1993 and chatting with people who could make things happen with computers&#8230;really make things happen. Coders, managers, hackers&#8230;they were all there and a tight nit core of about 6 of us stayed in [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border: 0px none ; float: left; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="/uploads/FileAlert.Thumbs.png" alt="" width="110" height="110" />In the beginning of things, open source was about open everything.  I remember joining an irc channel # on efnet back in 1993 and chatting with people who could make things happen with computers&#8230;really make things happen.  Coders, managers, hackers&#8230;they were all there and a tight nit core of about 6 of us stayed in touch for about 7 years until we went our separate ways and began to use irc less and less.  The thing that I remember the most is the fact that when I joined their little group, I was a complete and total n00b.  Not just a n00b to Open Source&#8230;but to computers altogether.  I had a Texas Instruments computer back in 1985 but only messed with that for about a year.  Mice were new to me&#8230;I didn&#8217;t know ANYTHING at all.  In the short time that I began chatting on irc, I was shown how to do things.  When I didn&#8217;t know how to do something, I could count on one of the guys or girls in the channel helping me to solve my problem within a matter of minutes.  These people stepped down off of their level of operation long enough to educate me in the ways of the open source.</p>
<p>I look fondly back at this time and have spoken about it before&#8230;not because I don&#8217;t think something like this exists now&#8230;just that I think it is a rarity.  There was a time when this &#8220;spirit of open source&#8221; was all about educating and furthering the program/app that you were working on.  Now it seems that when a new user comes in to any channel on irc or forum, they are told off with a hearty RTFM (Read the &#8216;Friendly&#8217; Manual).</p>
<p>Where did this Elitism come from?  Where and when did Linux and open source become about the mentality &#8220;you must be this knowledgeable to ride?&#8221;  It pains me to see people do this to new users&#8230;distancing themselves from potential advocates of open source&#8230;zealous ones at that.  It&#8217;s a real testament to some of these new users STILL wanting to plug open source and Linux, despite being squashed by elitists in forums.</p>
<p><span id="more-86"></span></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that some of you are saying, &#8220;this kind of thing doesn&#8217;t exist in my application/project/distro&#8217;s community. We are all open to all users, be they new or experienced. Sounds nirvana to me. I challenge you to take a closer look at your community and if you find Elitism, squash it. Having personally been involved in quite a good share of communities of major Linux distros (let&#8217;s just say, some major Debian and RPM based ones) I can assure you that despite the claims of new user friendly, most had a fair share of elitists swimming in their help channels.</p>
<p>Elitism has no place in open source. Open source is about freedom of everyone to look at the source of a program&#8230;EVERYONE. There are no country clubs for open source&#8230;you do not need to pay to get in. There are no qualifications for people to use open source. Since there are no criteria&#8230;why are people holding new users and others with limited knowledge&#8230;to a standard as if there are criteria?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ridiculous for current &#8216;expert&#8217; users or developers to withhold information or help from new users simply because, &#8220;new users need to cut their teeth&#8221;. Why? Because not everyone learns the same way. In the past, the only people who used Linux and open source were those that learned by reading and pouring through documents. A more coder mentality existed among those flocking to open source banners then. Fast forward to today&#8217;s learner. You&#8217;ll see many differences. Among the largest one is the visual learner.</p>
<p>The visual learner learns by examples and seeing things happen with his/her own eyes. There have been vast advancement in this arena on the internet. Today, we have websites with embedded videos, flash tutorials, and audio blogs with step-by-step processes and how-tos. Despite all this technology, people still send new users to the same avenue to learn. RTFM or do a search. What if that isn&#8217;t good enough for the person you&#8217;re telling it to? What if that person can&#8217;t learn things in this capacity? What if they need to see things in action?</p>
<p>In closing, we must rethink our approach to answering questions on forums and in chat clients. I challenge each and every single one of you to think about your responses to new users or those limited in knowledge. Helping these people to attain knowledge in different capacities can make or break their will and create a friend of open source for life&#8230;or through not helping, a foe.</p>
<p>As always, Yet Another Linux Blog is open to users of all walks of experience.  If you have a question, please ask away in the comments.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/mv-elitism-devnull/" rel="bookmark">mv elitism  /dev/null</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on May 31, 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/mv-elitism-devnull/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
