    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Yet Another Linux BlogYet Another Linux Blog &#187; firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://linux-blog.org/tag/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linux-blog.org</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 23:18:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla Firefox, From Darling to Enemy in One Release</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/mozilla-firefox-from-darling-to-enemy-in-one-release/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/mozilla-firefox-from-darling-to-enemy-in-one-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/?p=1961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is wrong with everyone in Linux land bagging on Mozilla Firefox and their 5.0 release? Complaints pretty much have one thing in common:  They claim there isn&#8217;t enough &#8216;new and shiny&#8217; things inside FF5 to warrant a major version.  This is illogical thinking because major version means NOTHING when it comes to usability of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/firefox2005-icon.png" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Flinux-blog.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F06%2Ffirefox2005-icon.png','Firefox')"><img class="size-full wp-image-2021 alignleft" style="margin: 5px;" title="Firefox" src="http://linux-blog.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/firefox2005-icon.png" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Flinux-blog.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F06%2Ffirefox2005-icon.png','Firefox')" alt="Firefox" width="256" height="256" /></a>What is wrong with <a title="everyone in Linux" href="http://www.csmonitor.com/Innovation/Horizons/2011/0622/Firefox-5-goes-live.-But-is-it-any-better-than-Firefox-4" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.csmonitor.com%2FInnovation%2FHorizons%2F2011%2F0622%2FFirefox-5-goes-live.-But-is-it-any-better-than-Firefox-4','bagging+on')" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.csmonitor.com%2FInnovation%2FHorizons%2F2011%2F0622%2FFirefox-5-goes-live.-But-is-it-any-better-than-Firefox-4','everyone+in+Linux')" target="_blank">everyone in Linux</a> land <a title="bagging on" href="http://www.csmonitor.com/Innovation/Horizons/2011/0622/Firefox-5-goes-live.-But-is-it-any-better-than-Firefox-4" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.csmonitor.com%2FInnovation%2FHorizons%2F2011%2F0622%2FFirefox-5-goes-live.-But-is-it-any-better-than-Firefox-4','bagging+on')" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.csmonitor.com%2FInnovation%2FHorizons%2F2011%2F0622%2FFirefox-5-goes-live.-But-is-it-any-better-than-Firefox-4','everyone+in+Linux')" target="_blank">bagging on</a> Mozilla Firefox and their 5.0 release?</p>
<p>Complaints pretty much have one thing in common:  They claim there isn&#8217;t enough &#8216;new and shiny&#8217; things inside FF5 to warrant a major version.  This is illogical thinking because major version means NOTHING when it comes to usability of software.  I&#8217;ve noticed that I can browse and use FF5 just as easily as I could FF4 and FF3 before it&#8230;I still type in URL&#8217;s and websites display.  My plugins all still work.  It starts up a bit faster and websites seem to load just a bit faster&#8230;which is good.  So why all the whining and complaining?</p>
<p>The silliest thing about this is that the same people complaining about Firefox 5 say that Chrome and IE are going to overtake it and that this is the beginning of the end for Mozilla and Firefox.  Poppycock!  Chrome and <a title="Chromium Blog on Agile Programming" href="http://blog.chromium.org/2010/07/release-early-release-often.html" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fblog.chromium.org%2F2010%2F07%2Frelease-early-release-often.html','Chromium+Blog+on+Agile+Programming')" target="_blank">Chromium have been using Agile programming</a> and the SAME EXACT METHODOLOGY BEHIND releases and version numbers that Firefox is doing now.  So where was the flack for Google and Chromium when they released often and incremented all the way up to version 10 and then version 12??</p>
<p>It is my opinion that the people shouting from the rooftops that Mozilla and Firefox are a sinking ship doomed to fail while using Chrome/Chromium in the background have no clue what Agile Programming (or in Google&#8217;s case, Agile-like programming) is or what it sets out to accomplish&#8230;and they&#8217;re showing how hypocritical they are.  If you&#8217;re one of these people, where were you when Chrome and Chromium was ratcheting up their version numbers without noticeable improvements and features?</p>
<p>Sad that Firefox and Mozilla, who championed one of the first fantastic browsers on Linux, has went from Linux Darling to Public Enemy Number One in a single release in some peoples eyes.  Hopefully, people will realize how silly it is and stop complaining?  Well, one can dream right?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at the quality of the software when levelling complaints instead of being upset that the version number doesn&#8217;t jive with what we think it should.  Thus far, my experience with FF5 has been pretty darn fantastic.  Thanks go out to Mozilla&#8230;you&#8217;ve done a great iteration of software yet again.</p>
<p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/mozilla-firefox-from-darling-to-enemy-in-one-release/" rel="bookmark">Mozilla Firefox, From Darling to Enemy in One Release</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on June 23, 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/mozilla-firefox-from-darling-to-enemy-in-one-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Force Firefox to Remember Initial Window Setting in KDE</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/force-firefox-to-remember-initial-window-setting-in-kde/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/force-firefox-to-remember-initial-window-setting-in-kde/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCLinuxOS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/?p=894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a laptop with the resolution of 1440&#215;900&#8230;so when I installed the latest TR6 from PCLinuxOS, I was dismayed to find out that when launching Firefox, it opened up in a window that was 1024 pixels. Of course, I maximized this and then closed it thinking that Firefox would remember my settings. The problem [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a laptop with the resolution of 1440&#215;900&#8230;so when I installed the latest TR6 from PCLinuxOS, I was dismayed to find out that when launching Firefox, it opened up in a window that was 1024 pixels.  Of course, I maximized this and then closed it thinking that Firefox would remember my settings.  The problem is&#8230;it didn&#8217;t remember my settings.</p>
<p>When I opened Firefox up again, it popped up to say hello once again at 1024 pixels.  Sure, you can right click on the Firefox window bar and drill down into application specific settings via KDE (yes, it&#8217;s that configurable) but I didn&#8217;t want to have to do this&#8230;because if I did, ALL Firefox windows would open up maximized&#8230;and that includes any pop-ups as well.  I also know that you can drill down even further to fix THAT problem.  However, it should &#8216;just work&#8217; right?  You shouldn&#8217;t have to change anything at all correct?  Well, I&#8217;ve found a fix that is pretty easy to accomplish&#8230;and I hope it helps the hundreds of people I found when searching through google on this.</p>
<p>Open up Firefox and it will open at the smaller screen size&#8230;in my case, it opened up 1024 px in width on my 1440px screen.  Then, hover over the top right hand corner with your mouse until you get the resize arrow.  Resize the window click dragging it to the top, right hand corner of the screen.  It should &#8216;snap-in&#8217; once you get close to maximized size.  Now close the window, and open Firefox again.  It should open up fully maximized.</p>
<p>I sure hope this saves someone time&#8230;because I spent the better part of a morning trying to fix this.</p>
<p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/force-firefox-to-remember-initial-window-setting-in-kde/" rel="bookmark">Force Firefox to Remember Initial Window Setting in KDE</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on February 10, 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/force-firefox-to-remember-initial-window-setting-in-kde/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/29 queries in 0.351 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 503/513 objects using disk: basic

Served from: linux-blog.org @ 2012-05-23 21:19:07 -->
