<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Yet Another Linux Blog &#187; functionality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://linux-blog.org/tag/functionality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linux-blog.org</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 03:57:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google News Redesign is Horrible</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/google-news-redesign-is-horrible/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/google-news-redesign-is-horrible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/?p=1632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, what do you think of the Google News redesign? You like it???  Tell me where you live so I can come hit you on the head a couple of times with a tack hammer&#8230;we&#8217;ll see if that jars anything loose.  All kidding aside (no I don&#8217;t want to hit anyone on the head with [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what do you think of the Google News redesign?</p>
<p>You like it???  Tell me where you live so I can come hit you on the head a couple of times with a <a title="tack hammer" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upholstery_hammer" target="_blank">tack hammer</a>&#8230;we&#8217;ll see if that jars anything loose.  All kidding aside (no I don&#8217;t want to hit anyone on the head with a tack hammer), there is plenty of negative feedback on the redesign.  If you&#8217;re not sure what changed, the <a title="original blog announcement" href="http://googlenewsblog.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">original Google News Blog announcement is here </a>(with screenshots) and you can also see it on your own computer (for now&#8230;they may roll it out to other countries besides the US soon so this may not work perpetually) here is how to check:</p>
<ol>
<li>Login to your google account.  Go to <a title="http://google.com/news" href="http://google.com/news" target="_blank">http://google.com/news</a></li>
<li>Now visit this link in a new tab:  <a title="http://www.google.ca/news" href="http://www.google.ca/news" target="_blank">http://www.google.ca/news</a></li>
</ol>
<p>The difference initially looks subtle but once you start scrolling it blares like a fog horn in your head.  I&#8217;m not the only one who thinks the redesign sucks.  The <a title="original announcement" href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/news/thread?tid=3b7b3632b344057f&amp;hl=en" target="_blank">original announcement</a> is filled with negative comments about the redesign.  Look on the right hand column of the announcement to see related posts and you&#8217;ll quickly see there are plenty of people who despise this &#8216;improvement&#8217;.  Even looking in the <a title="google news general forum" href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/news?hl=en" target="_blank">google news general forum</a> results in the most popular threads being discussions about how bad the redesign actually is.</p>
<p>People have even begun to label this redesign as the <a title="&quot;New Coke&quot; of Google products" href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/100703-151254" target="_blank">&#8220;New Coke&#8221; of Google products</a>.  I&#8217;m thinking they may be right.  <a title="New Coke Snafu" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Coke" target="_blank">Don&#8217;t remember the New Coke snafu</a>?</p>
<h3>How Can We Tell Google Their Redesign Sucks?</h3>
<p>Most people have been going to the support area for Google news.   In my opinion, this is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">ABSOLUTELY</span> the <strong>wrong</strong> area.  Instead, head over to  the blog announcement page and you&#8217;ll see a link to the <a title="Help Center" href="http://www.google.com/support/news/bin/answer.py?answer=1005762" target="_blank">Help  Center</a>.  Once there, on the top right hand corner of the  announcement is a link to <strong>comments.</strong> As of the writing of this  article there were about 15 comments on this change.</p>
<p>It is my  theory that Google is only paying attention to this comments section and  not to the thousands upon thousands of posts taking place inside their  support forums.  Afterall, is complaining that the redesign sucks really  a support issue?  Make your voice known by visiting the <a title="Help Center" href="http://www.google.com/support/news/bin/answer.py?answer=1005762" target="_blank">Help  Center</a> and dropping a comment via the comments link there.   Clicking this link opens up a sidewiki comment system.  Make sure you  are signed into your google account when leaving a comment.</p>
<h3>So what are the problems with Google News?</h3>
<p><strong>Tailored News</strong> &#8211; Google said the new redesign is &#8220;tailored to your interests&#8221; aka &#8220;news for you&#8221;.  Here&#8217;s the thing&#8230;I don&#8217;t want news tailored to my interests.  I want unedited and unfiltered news.  The reason I liked Google News in the first place was because I didn&#8217;t have paid sponsors results jockying to the front of the page.  I could read liberal and conservative news side by side.  I could get one side of the story and the other side of the story.</p>
<p>Now, I get only the side that interests me.  This doesn&#8217;t make for a well informed, rounded individual.  In other words, I want to see EVERYTHING and decide what to read&#8230;I don&#8217;t want that taken away from me at the beginning.</p>
<p><strong>Scrolling</strong> &#8211; Congratulations Google!  It now takes me 6 pages of scrolling to see the same amount of news I used to be able to read in 2.  Boy I would have loved to be a fly in the wall on the meeting where the &#8216;stream&#8217; concept was discussed&#8230;a big, monsterous fly so that I could have fly puked right on whoever thought it was a good idea.</p>
<p>Google news is now a facebook stream of news.  I don&#8217;t want that.  If I wanted a facebook stream of news, I&#8217;d create a facebook account and friend all the news agencies out there and wait for the news to stream to me.</p>
<p>It now takes me three to four times longer to read news than it did in the past.  I&#8217;m also getting a poor sample of the news.  I&#8217;m missing tons of articles I got in the past and headlines don&#8217;t pop like they used to.  It&#8217;s also HARDER to read when you&#8217;re scrolling 5000 lines of text.  For this reason alone the redesign is 20lbs of crap poured into a 10lb bag.</p>
<p><strong>Local News</strong> &#8211; Local news went from having its own section to having 3 headlines.  Thanks for reducing my local news Google&#8230;I really appreciate that.  Good to know that I don&#8217;t need to be reading what&#8217;s happening right outside my window.</p>
<p><strong>Fast Flip Reduction</strong> &#8211; Remember when fast flip was 3-4 wide across the bottom of your google news page?  Now it&#8217;s 1 article on the small right hand column.  WORTHLESS.  And of course, there is no way to get rid of it from your google news page.</p>
<p><strong>Spotlight</strong> &#8211; What the heck is this section for?  What do these articles have in them that allows them to have a spotlight shined on them?  Do publications pay Google to be included in this section?  Why can&#8217;t I remove this section if I want to?</p>
<p><strong>Most Popular </strong>- These articles are the most popular according to whom?  Am I just supposed to trust Google that they are the most popular ones out there?  Do publications pay Google to be included on this section?  Why can&#8217;t I remove it?</p>
<p>A good article that includes many of the reasons I discussed above <a title="Top 10 Reasons the New Google News Sucks" href="http://www.asktog.com/columns/084Top10GoogleNewsSucks.html" target="_blank">can be found here</a>.</p>
<h3>The Squeekiest Wheel?? Alternatives??</h3>
<p>So, if we complain en masse, will Google listen?  Does the squeekiest wheel get the most oil?  I hope so.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Until then, I won&#8217;t be using Google News.</span> A suitable and tolerable substitution can be found at Ask.com&#8230;for those of you saying &#8220;Try Bing!&#8221; I did and it sucks.  <a title="Ask.com's News Page" href="http://news.ask.com/news" target="_blank">Ask.com&#8217;s News Page</a> is simple and doesn&#8217;t require me to scroll 40 times just to read news.  Thanks for keeping it simple Ask!  You&#8217;ve got a new supporter!</p>
<p>What do you think of the new google news?  Please let me know with a comment below.  The redesign hasn&#8217;t been rolled out in all areas yet so you may not see it in your location&#8230;however, be warned that it is probably coming.  Hopefully, Google will realize this move is the New Coke Snafu and backtrack to their original design&#8230;not because the features they want to implement suck, but because when implementing them, they made reading the news MUCH harder than it should be.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/google-news-redesign-is-horrible/" rel="bookmark">Google News Redesign is Horrible</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on July 14, 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/google-news-redesign-is-horrible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hate KDE4? Ignorance Is Probably the Culprit</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/hate-kde4-ignorance-is-probably-the-culprit/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/hate-kde4-ignorance-is-probably-the-culprit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kde4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kwhat?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/?p=1165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s bust some myths today because a majority of KDE 4 haters out there have the same reasons for hating it.  I&#8217;m pretty sick of seeing posts and news articles about &#8220;why I don&#8217;t like KDE 4&#8243; and then seeing that the real reason the person is upset is because they don&#8217;t spend an extra [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s bust some myths today because a majority of KDE 4 haters out there have the same reasons for hating it.  I&#8217;m pretty sick of seeing posts and news articles about &#8220;why I don&#8217;t like KDE 4&#8243; and then seeing that the real reason the person is upset is because they don&#8217;t spend an extra few moments trying to figure things out&#8230;aka lazy and ignorant.</p>
<p>KDE 4 was NOT feature complete when it came out in the 4.0 version.  It IS feature complete (in my opinion) with the 4.2 and 4.3 versions.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Ignorant Reason #1 &#8211; I hate Dolphin and I Can&#8217;t Have Konqueror Anymore</strong></span></p>
<p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/filemanager.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1167" style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="filemanager" src="http://linux-blog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/filemanager.png" alt="filemanager" width="197" height="145" /></a>Wrong, you can use Konqueror.  You don&#8217;t have to use Dolphin, but you&#8217;ll be missing out on a lot of useful stuff.  Tell you what, now that you know that you don&#8217;t have to use Dolphin, why not use KDE 4 and give Dolphin a try every so often&#8230;you can still use Konqueror in the meantime and now that you know you can, you don&#8217;t have to go around trumpeting that you can&#8217;t to everyone who will listen and saying what a piece of crap it is.  Forget that you&#8217;ll lose nepomuk and the semantic desktop by dismissing dolphin.  Don&#8217;t know what that is?  <a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=semantic+desktop" target="_blank">Let me google that for you&#8230;</a></p>
<p>I sure hope this solves many peoples beef with KDE 4 right out of the gate because this is one of the reasons I find all over the web.  I really think the problem is the lethargic attitude that prevails from die hard KDE 3 fans.  Honestly guys, give Dolphin a try&#8230;it&#8217;s really a pretty decent file manager and is light years ahead of any other DE file manager.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Ignorant Reason #2 &#8211; I Can&#8217;t Have Folders or Files on the Desktop Anymore</strong></span></p>
<p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/desktopsettings.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1168" style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="desktopsettings" src="http://linux-blog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/desktopsettings.png" alt="desktopsettings" width="266" height="170" /></a>Wrong.  Right click on the desktop and choose &#8220;Desktop Settings&#8221;.  Select the drop down menu &#8220;Type&#8221; and select &#8220;Folder View&#8221;.  Your desktop now has folders, icons, and all other such things that you may want to clutter it with.</p>
<p>If you want to switch back to NOT using the folders and instead use widgets&#8230;right click on the desktop and choose &#8220;Folder View Settings&#8221; &gt;&gt; Select Type &gt;&gt; Desktop.</p>
<p>To top it off, if you select &#8220;Folder View&#8221;, the folders and icons act exactly like you would expect them to in KDE 3.  Not only can you select to show your desktop folders&#8230;but you can even show a folder like /home as your default desktop&#8230;show any folder you have access to, it&#8217;s up to you.  Yay right?  I give it a golf clap.  Let&#8217;s continue thinking out of the box and bust a few more myths.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Ignorant Reason #3 &#8211; I Can&#8217;t Move My Panel to the Top, Right, or Left.</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://linux-blog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/panelmove.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1169" style="margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px;" title="panelmove" src="http://linux-blog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/panelmove.png" alt="panelmove" width="864" height="83" /></a>Wrong.  Click the settings icon on the right hand side of your panel (it looks like a comma on the far right side of the panel).  The settings area pops open.  On that bar is something called &#8220;Screen Edge&#8221;.  Now, it seems pretty self explanatory that when you hover over the top of it, it gives you the 4 arrow icon that means you can drag and drop the panel wherever you want to&#8230;and being named &#8220;screen edge&#8221; seems to imply &#8220;which screen edge&#8230;left, right, bottom, or top&#8230;do I want this thing to appear on&#8221;.  Then again, I can see how screen edge can confuse people when you open the settings of a panel that resides on the screen edge.  Ok, maybe I can&#8217;t.  Well, at least you know you can move your panel around right?  Golf clap again?  Who plays golf anyway?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Ignorant Reason #4 &#8211; I Can&#8217;t Resize Folders and Files in Dolphin</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Wrong again.  Are you sensing a pattern yet?  Open Dolphin, go to the directory where you want to increase the folder size.  Hold the control key down&#8230;now roll your mouse wheel and be amazed as the folder size increases.  Invest all your money in Yet Another Linux Blog stock and move to Nicaragua.  Golf clap on your way to expedia.com for purchasing tickets.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Ignorant Reason #5 &#8211; I Like to Use My Own Color Schemes&#8230;I Can&#8217;t Do That in KDE4.</strong></span></p>
<div id="attachment_1173" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 264px"><a href="http://linux-blog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/systemsettings.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-1173" style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="systemsettings" src="http://linux-blog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/systemsettings.png" alt="systemsettings" width="254" height="146" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">System Settings</p></div>
<p style="text-align: left;">KDE4 absolutely allows you to create your own color schemes.  It really helps to look around inside the system settings tool.  Go to your Kmenu &gt;&gt; System &gt;&gt; System Settings.  Once there, look for Appearance.  You can also use the top search</p>
<div id="attachment_1174" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 266px"><a href="http://linux-blog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/appearancecolors.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-1174" style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="appearancecolors" src="http://linux-blog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/appearancecolors.png" alt="appearancecolors" width="256" height="165" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Appearance Colors</p></div>
<p style="text-align: left;">bar to look for any term&#8230;so if you were to type &#8220;color&#8221; there, you&#8217;d see that Appearance &amp; Display are returned.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;">Click on Appearance and you&#8217;re taken into a wonderful world of color and granular control of said color.  Change anything you&#8217;d like&#8230;.go crazy.  I hear pink is the new green&#8230;or is it green that was the new pink?  Whatever.  The only limits are your imagination.  <a href="http://www.ehow.com/how_4749117_improve-your-imagination.html" target="_blank">For those without imagination.</a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Ignorant Reason #6 &#8211; The Default Menu is Cludgy and Different and I Can&#8217;t Find Anything in KDE4</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Now there is no right or wrong here&#8230;you could be right depending on who you talk to.  However, the nice part about KDE4 is that they include the previous menu for you.  Right click the Kmenu and choose &#8220;Switch to Classic Menu Style&#8221;.  Now your menu is the exact same as it would be in KDE 3.5.10.  Please remember that answers are out there&#8230;you just have to search for them.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Closing the Door on Myths</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Hopefully, this closes the door on many misconceptions helps people who are ignorant to the leaps and bounds that KDE4 has made just in the past few months.  I&#8217;ve grown very tired of journalists and bloggers taking swipes at KDE4 and <a href="http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/locutus/what-i-dont-like-about-kde4-32871" target="_blank">spreading misinformation about it</a>.  If you have any questions about how to do something in KDE4, please leave a comment below and let&#8217;s work together in finding a solution.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/hate-kde4-ignorance-is-probably-the-culprit/" rel="bookmark">Hate KDE4? Ignorance Is Probably the Culprit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on July 23, 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/hate-kde4-ignorance-is-probably-the-culprit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do YOU Plug Your Blog to Web 2.0?</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/how-do-you-plug-your-blog-to-web-20/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/how-do-you-plug-your-blog-to-web-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YALB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/word/how-do-you-plug-your-blog-to-web-20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been drastically neglecting a few areas of my blog.  The main one is plugging it into social networks.  I&#8217;ve been using things like twitter, pownce, and stumbleupon&#8230;but I haven&#8217;t truly plugged my blog into these services. Now there are so many&#8230;I don&#8217;t even know how to plug them all in Which services are most [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been drastically neglecting a few areas of my blog.  The main one is plugging it into social networks.  I&#8217;ve been using things like twitter, pownce, and stumbleupon&#8230;but I haven&#8217;t truly plugged my blog into these services.</p>
<p>Now there are so many&#8230;I don&#8217;t even know how to plug them all in <img src='http://linux-blog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Which services are most important?  Which ones are you, the reader, using?  Thus far, the easiest way I&#8217;ve found to manage things is to choose one service like Tumblr or Pownce and aggregate all other services into it.  THEN to use friendfeed.com to envelop them into a stream.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious as to how others are managing things&#8230;I&#8217;d like to make Yet Another Linux Blog reach a larger audience and I think that this is a good starting point.  So if you have suggestions, please let me know <img src='http://linux-blog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/how-do-you-plug-your-blog-to-web-20/" rel="bookmark">How do YOU Plug Your Blog to Web 2.0?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on June 13, 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/how-do-you-plug-your-blog-to-web-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Reader, You Suck</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/google-reader-you-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/google-reader-you-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/word/google-reader-you-suck/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE:  Google Reader has changed their behavior as of late.  This post no longer applies as the behavior I wanted has been integrated.  Thanks for reading Google! When I&#8217;m not using BlogBridge (that is, when I&#8217;m checking my feeds from someone elses computer) I check via Google Reader. It&#8217;s been quite nice for me to [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE:  Google Reader has changed their behavior as of late.  This post no longer applies as the behavior I wanted has been integrated.  Thanks for reading Google! <img src='http://linux-blog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>When <a href="http://linux-blog.org/index.php?/archives/161-Blogbridge,-Simply-the-Best-RSS.html">I&#8217;m not using BlogBridge</a> (that is, when I&#8217;m checking my feeds from someone elses computer) I check via <a href="http://www.google.com/reader">Google Reader</a>.  It&#8217;s been quite nice for me to check out what&#8217;s happening in the world of Linux while away from my standard feed reading environment.</p>
<p>Recently though, they have changed the default behavior.  Now when I want to mark an entire feed read (feeds with a large number of unread feeds), an annoying confirmation dialog box pops up and I have to confirm that I truly do want to mark all of my feeds as read (in true Microsoftian-esque style mind you).</p>
<p>Whoever enabled this needs to be sentenced to a life of annoying popup dialog boxes.  Make their primary desktop be Vista and make them turn on the UAC and make them do their normal job.  Sentence them to an entire year of stupid annoying popups.  I despise popup dialogs&#8230;the demon brain children of the department of redundancy department&#8230; (a department google must now have created&#8230;and here I thought Microsoft was the only company that had one of these!) more than anything in computing.</p>
<p>Please google reader, take out that stupid dialog! Or at least give us a checkbox option.  This type of behavior is frustrating, redundant, and lame.  I cry suckage google reader &gt;:|</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/google-reader-you-suck/" rel="bookmark">Google Reader, You Suck</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on January 26, 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/google-reader-you-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update your RSS Feeds&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/update-your-rss-feeds/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/update-your-rss-feeds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YALB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/word/update-your-rss-feeds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve decided to add a feedburner feed. Currently, I don&#8217;t even know how many subscribers I have to Yet Another Linux Blog and I&#8217;d like to know because it&#8217;s not a bad service. It&#8217;s always interesting to find out if anyone is actually out there reading. So please visit the page in the next few [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve decided to add a feedburner feed.  Currently, I don&#8217;t even know how many subscribers I have to Yet Another Linux Blog and I&#8217;d like to know <img src='http://linux-blog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  because it&#8217;s not a bad service.  It&#8217;s always interesting to find out if anyone is actually out there reading. So please visit the page in the next few days and if you&#8217;d like to use the feedburner feed, please update your feedlist.</p>
<p><!-- s9ymdb:475 -->Thanks for reading!</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/update-your-rss-feeds/" rel="bookmark">Update your RSS Feeds&#8230;</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on March 3, 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/update-your-rss-feeds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of Vista, Linux, and the User Experience</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/of-vista-linux-and-the-user-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/of-vista-linux-and-the-user-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/word/of-vista-linux-and-the-user-experience/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading this article earlier this week and thought that it was interesting. It announced the Windows Vista release as being delayed. I thought that this was just par for the course and something Microsoft always has done and will always do&#8230;delay. However, what does this mean for the Linux desktop? Does it mean [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border: 0px none ; float: left; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="/uploads/FileAlert.Thumbs.png" alt="" width="110" height="110" />I was reading <a title="Vista Delay" href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/11958674/" target="_blank">this article</a> earlier this week and thought that it was interesting. It announced the Windows Vista release as being delayed. I thought that this was just par for the course and something Microsoft always has done and will always do&#8230;delay. However, what does this mean for the Linux desktop? Does it mean anything at all? Probably not on the scale most are hoping.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s Opportunity, Albeit, a Small One</span></p>
<p>Does anyone else here smell that? It&#8217;s opportunity. Perhaps an opportunity to push Linux just a little while longer and to develop it into what it needs to be before Microsoft once again proliferates itself onto every PC in America and sets the standard to which all things are compared.  I can just see it when Vista finally does release&#8230;all of the comparison articles that will sprout across the web between Vista and desktops such as Ubuntu and SuSe 10.X.  Linux can gain ground only one way; if it can become about user experience versus user function.  If it can do that, I think Linux just might gain some ground. Babysteps&#8230;that&#8217;s what it is all about.</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s OS has always been a rip-off of the work others do. OS/2 did things before Microsoft&#8230;Macs did things before Microsoft. They&#8217;ve been playing constant catch up since Windows began. If developers and users seize this opportunity in Linux to develop their distros in new ways, it can give Linux a slight foothold onto the desktop. Notice I said <em>slight</em> foothold. That&#8217;s because Linux will never storm onto the desktop. It will chip away slowly at the desktop until it gains acceptance. Linux has been granted a small door to the desktop and there is a set criteria for those distros that want to go through it. Will your favorite distro be able to go through the door?  Can it provide the user experience needed to win people on the desktop over?</p>
<p><span id="more-123"></span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">User Experience versus User Function</span></p>
<p>Most Linux distros just don&#8217;t get it. Everyone touts Ubuntu. They don&#8217;t get it. They say Linux for human beings but then make it so only human beings that are technologically savvy can use it. SimplyMEPIS touts being simple yet you have to enter into your sources.list and edit it before you can update it the first time. All of these distros have forgotten why people create operating systems and software. They&#8217;re trying really hard but missing the mark ever so slightly.</p>
<p>Why do people create operating systems and software? To help people with computing right? Perhaps to become notorious? Imagine that you have no operating system or an OS with no software to use on you PC. How would you accomplish anything at all? It would be rather difficult. The interesting part about this is that if you ask any software developer or programmer why they program/develop software they do it for 3 reasons:</p>
<ol>
<li>Very good Pay and notoriety</li>
<li>Because they Can</li>
<li>To assist themselves or others with Computing Functions</li>
</ol>
<p>There is nothing wrong with these approaches (I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve left out a couple of approaches)&#8230;but something is lost in the transfer between programmer/developer and the end user. What is it? It&#8217;s knowledge and experience&#8230;or lack thereof.</p>
<p>Anyone can make a program function. I have a C program I wrote waaaay back in the day that can operate as accounting software. Yet, people use QuickBooks, Kmymoney, and Appgen. Why is that? Why don&#8217;t they use the bare bones functional program they could get for free from me? It works pretty darn good&#8230;helps them file their taxes, and keeps track of all finances&#8230;why don&#8217;t they use this functional program? Because the knowledge it takes to use and support it is greater than those other programs I mentioned <span style="text-decoration: underline;">AND</span> because it plainly doesn&#8217;t provide the same user experience as the aforementioned programs. It&#8217;s all of these reasons we can roll up into something called the &#8220;User Experience.&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Experienced User and User Experience</span></p>
<p>One of my friends on the web is the webmaster of Lobby4Linux.com. He&#8217;s done some small usability studies in the best place you could possibly do it&#8230;a suburban shopping mall. You do studies like that and you can really tell where you stand. Sad to say that current desktops for Linux don&#8217;t stand a chance the way they are currently because most developers aren&#8217;t developing in the right mindset and focus. They&#8217;re developing for each other and for props from the community.</p>
<p>Imagine for a second if Apple decided they didn&#8217;t want to make Ipod easy to use anymore&#8230;they just wanted to develop software for their buddies and they wanted to make Ipod&#8217;s have the latest bells and whistles all the while ignoring pleas from those who cry out for change. That&#8217;s what Linux is doing. Ignoring the most important part of their community. New users and their opinions should hold the most weight with Linux developers and application programmers&#8230;because these people are providing the most pure look at the software. They aren&#8217;t polluted with elitism, they haven&#8217;t adopted a stance with the GPL or FLOSS yet&#8230;they&#8217;re just here to check out the software.</p>
<p>Say you are a developer or programmer. The minute a new user doesn&#8217;t understand how to do something, there is a problem with your product. No you can&#8217;t fix everything for everyone, but as a developer you should be trying to do so&#8230;we cannot reach perfection but we can chase it.</p>
<p>The odd part about this user centric philosophy is&#8230;if a developer or company or even a distro adopts a &#8216;user experience&#8217; centric development process&#8230;they succeed. Two examples show us how clear this is.</p>
<ol>
<li>Apple Ipod. Nuff said&#8230;they aren&#8217;t about functions and features&#8230;they don&#8217;t claim to be the best video/audio tool out there. They offer the best user experience. Hence, why they are number one and sell more product worldwide than anyone period. Also this is why they are the largest brand recognized on the planet&#8230;even more recognized than Microsoft.</li>
<li>Novell and SuSe 10 &#8211; You may think you know what SuSe is about&#8230;you may be discounting Novell because you think their ship has set sail many years ago when Microsoft took over. Then you need to <a title="Novell Brainshare 2006" href="http://www.novell.com/img/flash/load_stream.html?temp=1&amp;id=brainshare2006monday_press_conference" target="_blank">watch this video on Brainshare</a> and pay specific attention to why the two desktop developers are developing the way they are. You&#8217;ll hear about user experience and &#8216;won&#8217;t attract new users&#8217; and other key phrases. This is terminology and focus that ALL Linux distros should be focused on if they want their distro to succeed.</li>
</ol>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong&#8230;I&#8217;m all for having a new user Google a solution or RTFM. However, has anyone ever stopped to think that a new user might not know how to search for information? How many new users out there know Boolean logic? It&#8217;s relatively hard for new users to Linux in general to find information on how to do things in Linux. Why do many community members throw these new users an anchor when they ask for a life raft? Remember, if Linux is to succeed, it needs to be about the entire user experience which starts the minute the user thinks to him/herself &#8220;I think I&#8217;ll give that Linux thing a try.&#8221; The spotlight is unfortunately on Linux and community from the beginning.</p>
<p>Taking the time to teach a new user the correct way of searching for answers is a good step in the right direction. However, taking stock in what area of the OS/software that new user is questioning is a better step in the right direction. Listen to the new users, their eyes are open where others are closed. They don&#8217;t look at the same scene everyday&#8230;they see things anew. Remember:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes. ~Marcel Proust</em></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">It&#8217;s about togetherness, not elitism</span></p>
<p>Linux is about a large collection of people working toward a common goal. This common goal is to proliferate Linux to all corners of the globe as an alternative way of computing to the status quo that Microsoft gives us. It absolutely is not about being smarter than everyone or being able to look down one&#8217;s nose at people. Unfortunately, due mainly to a rise in popularity of Linux, an influx of interest has resulted in an outflow of community. Elitism runs rampant through many forums and newbies are sometimes chastised for asking questions instead of being shown the proper way of asking.</p>
<p>So what are we to do? How do we continue making The Linux Experience about togetherness vs. elitism? The Linux community on a whole must take a stand against those who have no desire to help someone based solely on their experience level. Sure, I know there are those that say RTFM (read the friendly manual) or &#8216;google it&#8217; but you and I both know that information isn&#8217;t organized how it should be with Linux. Remember that some of these people that are trying Linux for the first time don&#8217;t even know about boolean logic with search engines nor about http://google.com/linux so how do we expect them to find information unless it is organized logically (say&#8230;in a wiki)?</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Door is Open, Only a Few can Pass</span></p>
<p>The door to the desktop is open. I truly believe that Linux can take innroads to success for personal computing. However, I believe that if more distros do not take the approach of SuSe or PCLinuxOS, being about user experience versus whiz bang nifty old tools and bells and whistles&#8230;Linux will not gain desktop adoption.</p>
<p>My grandfather used to be a handy-man at a retirement home when I was a little kid. I remember going to work with him during the summer when school was out (mainly because we couldn&#8217;t afford daycare) and working with him. One thing sticks out in my memory now that I write this article about user experience. I remember that one year my grandmother bought him new tools to use on the job. They were supposed to be the best thing on the market and carry a lifetime guarantee. Those tools were used a total of 3 days&#8230;they didn&#8217;t have the feel of the old ones.</p>
<p>Linux will need to feel like those old tools to everyone before it can succeed. It needs to give people a warm and fuzzy feeling and it needs to cater to the most technically challenged person on the planet in order to gain ultimate acceptance.</p>
<p>Perhaps developers and programmers will read this article and choose the red pill instead of the blue one. Then again, they may not. Whatever they decide, their user-base is changing toward one with less Linux knowledge and one that thrives on user experience. If one does not adapt, one will be left behind.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/of-vista-linux-and-the-user-experience/" rel="bookmark">Of Vista, Linux, and the User Experience</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on March 23, 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/of-vista-linux-and-the-user-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State of Linux:  The Linux Wizard</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/state-of-linux-the-linux-wizard/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/state-of-linux-the-linux-wizard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/word/state-of-linux-the-linux-wizard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started asking myself questions about Linux the other day. I began to think about what Linux lacked that Windows had (trying to get into the head of a die hard Windows fan and persuade them to think Linux). Certainly it isn’t appearance. Windows is actually behind Linux in this area. Certainly it isn’t detectability. [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border: 0px none ; float: left; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="/uploads/Foldercheck.Thumbs.png" alt="" width="110" height="110" />I started asking myself questions about Linux the other day.  I began to think about what Linux lacked that Windows had (trying to get into the head of a die hard Windows fan and persuade them to think Linux).  Certainly it isn’t appearance.  Windows is actually behind Linux in this area.  Certainly it isn’t detectability.  Linux is also ahead of Windows in this area.  Driver support?  Yes…big gap…but one that we as Linux programmers, developers, and users are all well aware of and one that cannot be improved drammatically unless manufacturers get behind Linux.  So what is left?  Wizards.  Wizards?  That&#8217;s right.  Wizards.  No, not the D&amp;D spellcasting folk&#8230;put your twenty sided die away.  I&#8217;m speaking of the nice trail of menu&#8217;s that greet you to set up a function in your operating system.</p>
<p><span id="more-93"></span></p>
<p>What makes menu&#8217;s more user friendly? Wizards. Setup your internet connection in a snap! Configure your printer in a few clicks! Etc&#8230;so on and so forth. I know that some of you are probably thinking &#8220;what the heck is this moron spewing!?&#8221; but hear me out. I&#8217;m not saying we should make Linux become Windows. I&#8217;m saying that we should cater to new users to make Linux more user friendly which will in turn make Linux even more popular and mainstream. What happens when Linux becomes more popular? Companies will start listening. What happens when companies start listening? That gap we were speaking of in driver support becomes smaller and smaller. We need wizards! D&amp;D need not apply. Sorry Gandalf.<br />
I&#8217;ve thought of projects I could start millions of times in Linux. I&#8217;m usually content with just supporting in other roles such as Project Management or Webmaster. Now I find myself wanting to become a programmer to address this issue. But what language? What programming language would work for all xwindow environments? This is a questions I&#8217;d put to you, the reader. Mainly because I have no experience with menu or wizard designing and I&#8217;d like to know. I&#8217;d like to know if it is difficult and takes tons of time or if it is something that you can do in an afternoon of work.</p>
<p>Nothing get&#8217;s me more riled than hearing people get mad when someone suggests that Linux become more user friendly. &#8220;No!&#8221; they shout. &#8220;Let them find out things for themselves! I did and I&#8217;m better for it.&#8221; Fine. Be exclusive. Rumble off into your l33t Linux club and close the door on open source. Or&#8230;perhaps you can understand that an operating system is something that should be <span style="text-decoration: underline;">made to WORK FOR YOU</span>. Not against you. The main goal an operating system should have&#8230;ANY operating system&#8230;is to become easier to use and more efficient. I say that wizards will do just that for new users. As for older and more experienced users close the wizard when it launches or push cancel. Easy enough eh? You don&#8217;t have to use them if you don&#8217;t want them.</p>
<p>I know, I know. Perhaps I&#8217;m being crass and standoffish&#8230;but I&#8217;m really tired of people not understanding the benefit of an operating system that caters to your need and becomes more efficient. Sure Windows is a money hog and is full of security holes. However, it is extremely new user friendly with wizards for installing, removing, and adding hardware. With this the case, wouldn&#8217;t open source benefit from also having similar functions as well? We don&#8217;t have to make it &#8216;just like Windows&#8217; but we can make it friendlier than it is right?</p>
<p>Perhaps you&#8217;re not convinced yet. Perhaps you&#8217;re a die hard open source fan that just can&#8217;t get past your favorite Linux distro becoming more &#8216;windows-like&#8217;. That&#8217;s fine. That is your prerogative and is your right. However, don&#8217;t trash new users who don&#8217;t share your view. The beauty of open source (in our case, Linux) now is that just about anyone can use it if they have a bit of technical knowledge. I hope we can expand that audience to include users that have zero technical knowledge. The idea? Let open source and Linux become inclusive and not exclusive. Appealing to a wider audience will never hurt Linux.</p>
<p>To make things truly user friendly, more care needs to go in to letting people know what is going on with their operating system and how they can control it. A user should have to be able to program in perl or C++ to tell what error their music player gave them when it crashed. Things should be more user friendly. The menu driven wizard will do much for making Linux more user (especially new user) friendly. Hopefully, people will realize this fact instead of criticize this fact.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/state-of-linux-the-linux-wizard/" rel="bookmark">State of Linux:  The Linux Wizard</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on August 11, 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/state-of-linux-the-linux-wizard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>mv elitism  /dev/null</title>
		<link>http://linux-blog.org/mv-elitism-devnull/</link>
		<comments>http://linux-blog.org/mv-elitism-devnull/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 14:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>devnet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great divide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linux-blog.org/word/mv-elitism-devnull/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the beginning of things, open source was about open everything. I remember joining an irc channel # on efnet back in 1993 and chatting with people who could make things happen with computers&#8230;really make things happen. Coders, managers, hackers&#8230;they were all there and a tight nit core of about 6 of us stayed in [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border: 0px none ; float: left; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="/uploads/FileAlert.Thumbs.png" alt="" width="110" height="110" />In the beginning of things, open source was about open everything.  I remember joining an irc channel # on efnet back in 1993 and chatting with people who could make things happen with computers&#8230;really make things happen.  Coders, managers, hackers&#8230;they were all there and a tight nit core of about 6 of us stayed in touch for about 7 years until we went our separate ways and began to use irc less and less.  The thing that I remember the most is the fact that when I joined their little group, I was a complete and total n00b.  Not just a n00b to Open Source&#8230;but to computers altogether.  I had a Texas Instruments computer back in 1985 but only messed with that for about a year.  Mice were new to me&#8230;I didn&#8217;t know ANYTHING at all.  In the short time that I began chatting on irc, I was shown how to do things.  When I didn&#8217;t know how to do something, I could count on one of the guys or girls in the channel helping me to solve my problem within a matter of minutes.  These people stepped down off of their level of operation long enough to educate me in the ways of the open source.</p>
<p>I look fondly back at this time and have spoken about it before&#8230;not because I don&#8217;t think something like this exists now&#8230;just that I think it is a rarity.  There was a time when this &#8220;spirit of open source&#8221; was all about educating and furthering the program/app that you were working on.  Now it seems that when a new user comes in to any channel on irc or forum, they are told off with a hearty RTFM (Read the &#8216;Friendly&#8217; Manual).</p>
<p>Where did this Elitism come from?  Where and when did Linux and open source become about the mentality &#8220;you must be this knowledgeable to ride?&#8221;  It pains me to see people do this to new users&#8230;distancing themselves from potential advocates of open source&#8230;zealous ones at that.  It&#8217;s a real testament to some of these new users STILL wanting to plug open source and Linux, despite being squashed by elitists in forums.</p>
<p><span id="more-86"></span></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that some of you are saying, &#8220;this kind of thing doesn&#8217;t exist in my application/project/distro&#8217;s community. We are all open to all users, be they new or experienced. Sounds nirvana to me. I challenge you to take a closer look at your community and if you find Elitism, squash it. Having personally been involved in quite a good share of communities of major Linux distros (let&#8217;s just say, some major Debian and RPM based ones) I can assure you that despite the claims of new user friendly, most had a fair share of elitists swimming in their help channels.</p>
<p>Elitism has no place in open source. Open source is about freedom of everyone to look at the source of a program&#8230;EVERYONE. There are no country clubs for open source&#8230;you do not need to pay to get in. There are no qualifications for people to use open source. Since there are no criteria&#8230;why are people holding new users and others with limited knowledge&#8230;to a standard as if there are criteria?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ridiculous for current &#8216;expert&#8217; users or developers to withhold information or help from new users simply because, &#8220;new users need to cut their teeth&#8221;. Why? Because not everyone learns the same way. In the past, the only people who used Linux and open source were those that learned by reading and pouring through documents. A more coder mentality existed among those flocking to open source banners then. Fast forward to today&#8217;s learner. You&#8217;ll see many differences. Among the largest one is the visual learner.</p>
<p>The visual learner learns by examples and seeing things happen with his/her own eyes. There have been vast advancement in this arena on the internet. Today, we have websites with embedded videos, flash tutorials, and audio blogs with step-by-step processes and how-tos. Despite all this technology, people still send new users to the same avenue to learn. RTFM or do a search. What if that isn&#8217;t good enough for the person you&#8217;re telling it to? What if that person can&#8217;t learn things in this capacity? What if they need to see things in action?</p>
<p>In closing, we must rethink our approach to answering questions on forums and in chat clients. I challenge each and every single one of you to think about your responses to new users or those limited in knowledge. Helping these people to attain knowledge in different capacities can make or break their will and create a friend of open source for life&#8230;or through not helping, a foe.</p>
<p>As always, Yet Another Linux Blog is open to users of all walks of experience.  If you have a question, please ask away in the comments.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://linux-blog.org/mv-elitism-devnull/" rel="bookmark">mv elitism  /dev/null</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://linux-blog.org">Yet Another Linux Blog</a> on May 31, 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://linux-blog.org/mv-elitism-devnull/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
